The Beacon Calls Fans to Classic Nosferatu

The Beacon is located at the very edge of Columbia City, nestled in a wall of ivy and wedged between nail salons and a neon-illuminated funeral home. The single-screen cinema opened its doors in 2019, boasting an eclectic mix of curated films. Amidst the popularity of Robert Eggers’ new film, it’s only logical for a place like The Beacon to showcase one of its predecessors: Werner Herzog’s Nosferatu: The Vampyre

Ellen in Eggers' 2024 Nosferatu film, face with blood streams

Ellen (Lily-Rose Depp) in Eggers’ Nosferatu, 2024

Empire Magazine

Although this was a matinee screening, the sun is already setting; dreary and atmospherically appropriate backdrop for some vampiric theater. But not just any vampire. Nosferatu, Orlok, Dracula; whatever you call him, he’s no Lestat or Edward Cullen. He’s not even Dracula as portrayed by Gary Oldman. This is not a vampire meant to be lusted after (although many certainly do). This is a monster, first and foremost, bordering on the grotesque.

Eggers’ Nosferatu is separated from the original by more than a century, the latter a definitive example of German Expressionism. Director F.W. Murnau rejects the trappings of realism in favor of nightmarish and emotional showmanship. Eggers, on the other hand, revels in the romantic and the sexual, emphasizing the love triangle between Ellen, Orlok, and Thomas (Lucy, Dracula, and Johnathan in Herzog’s) in a much more familiar supernatural-horror setting. Herzog’s own homage was released in 1979, exactly between the release of its predecessor and its successor. This was the same year Bram Stoker’s novel entered the public domain. So, unlike Murnau who was so thoroughly sued by Stoker’s widow that his film almost didn’t survive, Herzog was free to use the characters’ original names.

1922 Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror, dir. F.W. Murnau / SlashFilm

Despite these immediate differences, Herzog’s love for the classic silent horror film is apparent. He described F.W. Murnau’s 1922 classic Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror as the greatest film to ever come out of Germany. Dracula, as portrayed by Klaus Kinski, has the familiar gaunt features, rat-like face and ears, and talon-like acrylics of Count Orlok. Kinski even mirrors the mannerisms of Max Schreck from the original role. 

This is not a remake, however, but a love letter. We open not in despondent Transylvania, nor in dreary London. Rather, we open on the small German city of Wismar. Johnathan and Lucy live in a beatific setting; their modest home is filled with light and greenery, and their favorite place is to walk along the seaside together. In stark contrast to its predecessor, this iteration of Nosferatu opens not with shadows and darkness, but with the promise (however brief) of light and love. 

It is, of course, short lived. Johnathan Harker’s idyllic life fades and is replaced with a brutal journey to the count’s castle. No coach will take him, nor will anyone give him a horse. Harker is forced to make the journey on foot and finds himself in the decaying ruins of a castle. There is nothing grand about anything in Herzog’s film. The homes are modest, and Dracula’s home barely stands. Rather than getting lost in expansive, gothic halls, our protagonist feels like a rat in a snare. The castle’s rooms are small, its dining room not a great hall but an overcrowded nook. The only thing large about the castle are the doors, making Harker seem almost childlike as he searches for Dracula in the light of day. 

Eggers and Herzog both elaborated on Lucy’s (or Ellen’s) role in the story. In both, she experiences a much greater degree of attraction for Orlok/Dracula. In the 1979 version, though, it is Lucy, not Johnathan or even Van Helsing, who rises to the challenge of vanquishing Dracula in order to not only save her husband’s life, but the lives of everyone in her home, where the vampire’s plague has left countless dead. Lucy never succumbs to Dracula’s charms or spells. Instead, she lures him to his own death, using her own body as bait.

Nosferatu: The Vampyre, Herzog 1979 / The Criterion Collection

In fact, Herzog seems to go out of his way to blur the lines between “hero” and “villain.” Ever the documentarian, Herzog spends a lot of time showing Dracula loading carriages with dirt and rats or running through the dark streets of Wismar carrying black coffins of plague over his shoulder. There is a physicality to this iteration of the prolific vampire that is absent from the others; he is literally struggling under the weight of his sins. But as he does so, the music swells in triumph. It’s almost as if we’re meant to see something almost human in him. 

At the end of Murnau’s film, Orlok’s castle is destroyed as the so-called symphony of horror comes to an end. Ellen dies, but survives just long enough to bid her husband farewell. Eggers’s version ends in a similar fashion. Although no one makes it out unscathed, the nightmare is over. In Herzog’s, however, things shake out a little differently: Lucy succeeds in her scheme at the cost of her own life. Dracula succumbs to the sun, and is destroyed.

But what about poor, sickly Johnathan? As soon as Dracula is no more, the gray-skinned real estate agent seems to regain his strength. His two front teeth have grown as well, as have his fingernails. The final shot of the film is Johnathan riding across the beach he and his wife had loved so much, fading into the mist. In Herzog’s, the horror doesn’t end. Rather, it endures. Much like the character of Orlok himself, the vampire cannot be killed. Only, perhaps, reinvented. 


Unlike more modern cineplexes, The Beacon is a single screen theater that can accommodate approximately fifty people. Not unlike our unlucky protagonist, we can also feel the closeness of the red-curtained walls and other nearby bodies. I’ve been to The Beacon several times, but this was the first time I’d ever seen a packed house. They even brought in extra chairs for a few enthusiastic stragglers.

There’s something special about being in a movie theater with so many strangers pressed together like sardines. It’s similar to how one feels when attending a comic con or something similar; there’s a shared love in the room that’s almost palpable. That’s how it felt in that tiny theater as the audience shared armrests, chuckles, and even one extremely well-timed gasp. We weren’t just watching the same film. We were building an experience together. 

Izzy Christman

Izzy Christman (they/them) has been a freelance writer and editor for more than a decade. They studied writing at Ohio University before returning to the West Coast. Izzy has worked as a ghostwriter, copyeditor, and content writer. They've even writing classes taught at Seattle's Hugo House. Their work has appeared in a number of magazines, anthologies, and podcasts, including The NoSleep Podcast, Unwinnable Magazine, and Tales to Terrify. Izzy is an active member of the Seattle Chapter of the Horror Writer's Association.

Previous
Previous

Parker’s Pages: The Highest Tide

Next
Next

Max’s Musings: Shakespeare Sonnet